Frame the actual decision
Separate the choice from the wider issue and name who owns it.
Build judgement you can use under uncertainty.
Practise framing decisions, weighing evidence and making trade-offs without waiting for perfect information.
Length follows the practice and reinforcement your roles and situations need.
People who make, recommend or support consequential decisions at work.
Scope, format and preparation agreed around your team.
The decision feels urgent, but the question keeps changing. More information brings little clarity. Practise framing the call, exposing assumptions and choosing a useful next step.
Practical progress you can use in the work.
Separate the choice from the wider issue and name who owns it.
Identify assumptions, gaps and contrary evidence.
Record the choice and the conditions for reviewing it.
Suggested workshop outline. We shape the sequence and depth around your team.
Our approach to building capabilityPractise turning a broad problem into a decision statement. Identify the owner, constraints and the consequence of delay.
A decision frame for a realistic situation.
Sort the available information. Challenge the strongest assumption and identify what evidence would genuinely change the choice.
An evidence and assumption map.
Compare credible alternatives against agreed criteria. Explain the trade-offs to a partner and use their challenge to improve the reasoning.
An options comparison with explicit trade-offs.
Write a concise decision record. Agree a review trigger and practise explaining the decision to someone who was not in the room.
A decision record and a review prompt.
Apply the decision record to a real choice after the session. A manager or peer reviews the reasoning, the assumptions and what was learned.
A team has an idea customers seem to like, but limited evidence that they would use it.
Illustrative exampleClarify the immediate call: commit to delivery, gather specific evidence or stop. Identify who owns that choice.
Clarify the immediate call: commit to delivery, gather specific evidence or stop. Identify who owns that choice.
Separate expressions of interest from evidence of use. Compare the cost and learning value of each option.
Choose the next step and write what evidence would support expanding, changing or stopping it.
Good judgement makes uncertainty explicit and gives the next decision better evidence.


The membership proposition was simplified and a set of initiatives moved into implementation.
Related work with CISI: a five-day sprint brought its membership proposition into focus and moved initiatives into implementation. This outline develops the practice of making choices explicit.
Read the storyTeams that need a practical decision method they can keep using.
A substitute for the decision authority or specialist advice a particular situation requires.
Explore the ways we can helpYes. We agree suitable examples during preparation, including what can be shared and where an anonymised situation would work better.
Agree observable behaviours, such as clearer decision statements and recorded assumptions, then review examples from the work after practice.
Interested in decision-making? Tell us about your team, the situation and what you would like to leave with. We can shape a useful starting point together.
info@inso.ggPrepare a message, then open it in your email app to review and send.
Privacy · Prefer to write directly? info@inso.gg
INSO · Decision-making · Suggested workshop outline. Format and scope are agreed around your team. /workshops/decision-making